ETT getting paranoid?

Currently ETT is panicking
For convenience ETT nonsense is in blue.

Mike/Monteverdi we are not interested in a debate at all. Your constant calls for us to expose who we are

Of course they are not interested in a debate because they realise that innuendo and deceit is not a debating tool.

Where is the reference to CONSTANT calls - ‘once’ does not equal CONSTANT – but then again ETT does not let accuracy or facts stand in the way of a distortion of the truth.

only confirm your desire to see us threatened in some way. What does it matter who we are, the truth is still the truth and unless you can post some cold hard facts to prove that what we state is not true then it stands.
Why should he publish cold hard fcts – they are here on this blog - and the COLD HARD FACTS clearly prove that ETT is incapable of presenting real facts or anything containing any truth.

The FLWG and the S.P.C.A. have either threatened us, attacked us or called on us to expose our identities. Where is the rebuttal if in fact what we have exposed is not the truth.
Even a drovers dog reading this blog could see the real facts. The FLWG and SPCA have never threatened you - its in your imagination. You really need your specialist to either change or increase your medication.
Apologies to any drovers dogs reading this blog because unlike ETT you do something positive for Australia.

We are well aware of your views and posting them on a forum makes you as liable as we are, so when posting your little blurb from The Age, we hope you are taking notice of your own implied threat.
But it’s a legal threat! Understand that ETT, it’s a legal threat! Not like yours to us ‘We know who and where you are’!

Further, by posting in support of Bigred as a representative of FLWG and therefore the Shared Parenting Council of Australia you are only further reinforcing the message that his view is your view. We get it ok?
Hold it we must have missed something! Monteverdi is now a representative of FLWG? and this be default makes him a representative of the SPCA? Does this mean all members of FLWG are automatically representatives of the SPCA? This must mean that ETT and cohorts who joined the FLWG are now representatives of the SPCA.
So ETT why are you attacking an organisation you are representatives of?
Seems very schizophrenic to us!

Do you also support the use of threats of violence against us? Yes we thought so!
ETT asks a question and then answers it, so why ask the question? no wonder the Family Court made the Judgment they did about their case.
Judging from his background he would support legally sanctioned actions.

We are sure Gerry Orkin will not be impressed with you posting his name all over the internet and also by posting to Peter Saxon on his blog that you firmly believe it is Gerry Orkin who writes on this blog. You have left yourself wide open and we certainly hope that Gerry uses whatever means possible to force you to retract your statements. Egg on your face Mike! And as Peter Saxon says 1+1 does not equal 3!

Actually Gerry Orkin will probably send him a box of cigars. Orkin’s site generates 50 hits and day and he must be ecstatic at being mentioned on a site which generates a HUNDRED TIMES MORE PER DAY.