WELL - WHY ARE WE NOT SURPRISED?

It seems that when ETT gets embarrassed with the real facts and not their own inventions they have to change tack. This time they are attacking the charitable status of DIDS and the Fatherhood Foundation. Somehow their rhetoric is very similar to the Nazis in the 1930s – un researched questions just to stir a little hatred and confusion. OF course we note that ETT has not sought to challenge the Status of any Womens groups that receive Federal funding –but then again ETT has made it abundantly clear that the truth is not a valuable item and that Equal Parenting Groups are fair game.

ETT said this
Charities, we don't think so!
http://thesharedparentingdisaster.blogspot.com/2008/11/government-funds.html

We left this comment and question on the above blog TheSharedParentingDisaster:

"Expose The Truth has left a new comment on the post "Government Funded Propaganda":

The rest of the post is the usual incitement and mistruths and to be honest unless you are an insomniac and need a boring yarn is a waste of your time.

BUT they do go on to say
It doesn't appear to us that either Fatherhood Foundation or D.I.D.S should have received a rating as a charity when they discriminate against women when that is illegal in this country.

FINE, however the phrase ‘It doesent appear to us” is the most apt. ETT has demonstrated they have ZERO understating of Australian Law, its interpretation, the Privacy Act and any basic understanding of commons sense or decency. How they think they can interpret Tax department legislation and its interpretation is beyond us when they have consistently demonstrated their ONE AND EQUALS THREE allegations against the SPCA and FLWG. Never mind - when you are that far divorced from reality anything probably makes sense to them.

HOWEVER WE DO HAVE A QUESTION ABOUT THEM POSTING ON THAT BLOG

The blog clearly identifies with anonymums – is ETT condoning identity theft?

Some previous parts of OUR blog follow:

IDENTITY THEFT?

Readers will still be puzzling over the ‘anonymums’ situation – did somebody STEAL the name?

Blogs posted under ‘anonymums’ always quote a lot of internet research so there would be a presumption they would have conducted a ‘who is ‘ search and discovered the domain names were registered.

Surely they were not trying to mislead readers by usurping (identity theft) someone else’s user name?

Now has the anonymums blogger STOLEN the names from the .com/.org/.net sites?

Is the owner of the domain names aware that someone is using the name?

OR are they just really annoyed they do not have a site with all the gloss and polish and millions of visitors of the Family Law Web Guide site?

Finally ETT had this to say
We will keep digging to see what we get back regarding the funding provided to S.P.C.A. for www.familylawwebguide.com.au. Stay tuned!!

STAY TUNED is correct because under an FOI for Government funding the applicant details are released to the recipient, NOT that it matters – ETT and the people that feed it information HAVE BEEN IDENTIFIED and their links to other organsations verified.

ETT and cohorts might have done well to reflect on the old adage “People that live in glass houses should not throw stones”