One and One Equals Three and more Outrageous Allegations

Dear oh dear just when we thought that some sense had gotten through to them reporting accurate facts ETT then comes up with this nonsense [unfounded allegation]
This is todays ETT allegation

Want to know who it is???
The author of this blog:

http://gettherealfacts-gettherealfacts.blogspot.com/


that was set up by the Shared Parenting Council of Australia via familylawwebguide.com.au to slam us is a guy called Peter Saxon. aka Nasty little man.

He is a founding member of Familylawwebguide.com.au and is a member of the SLR there. He is also a member of Dads In Distress.

One of his user names on familylawwebguide.com.au is Conan. Another is sneakydevil. There are others. Oh yes, another one is Viking, we almost forgot.

Whatever way you look at it, he is an accomplished liar and blatantly avoids the truth

Some correct answers:

This blog was not set up by the Shared Parenting Council

This blog was not set up by Peter Saxon who is certainly not a founding member of the FLWG. If Peter were Viking then his join date is listed as December 2006 whereas apparent founding members all have join dates of August and September 2006 [see ETT your lack of accurate research catches you out every time]

We are not certain whether he is amember of DIDS [presumably ETT means the DIDS forum?]

Where do they get those user names from? – just pick a name for the FLWG and hopefully label it to someone?

Note their use of the emotive term ‘to slam us’ which is actually their euphemism for ‘embarrass us by exposing our lies, false allegations and deceit’

Strange that when their allegations, mispresentations and deceit are exposed – they do not respond – such as this from yesterday. Still it is probably better they stay silent when they have made such a glaring mistake.

ETT had said
The SLR was set up by SPCA and so was Mothers4Equality. Debra Esquilante from the Gold Coast set this up in conjunction with Michael Green. Debra Esquilante is an active and key member of Fathers4Equality which is one of the vilest and most anti female mens groups out there. Spot any inconsistencies there Peter?

Get the real facts [us] replied
Yes a big inconsistency! because I assume you mean SRLR which traces back to 1999. You are actually saying the SPCA are really very clever people that can even read the future by setting up an organisation many many years before even the SPCA came into existence! That really beggars belief. Spot another inconsistency in your blog? –according to ETT the SPCA is anti female – if this had any truth in it why on Earth would they set up an organisation that also helps women? Inconsistency yes – if Debra is an active and key member of F4E why isn’t she posting on their site?

So folks when their shams are exposed there is no response, however some more questions for ETT -

How did the SPCA which started in 2002 set up another organisation which stared in 1989? [which by the way predates any of the groups in the SPCA]

Did the SPCA use their government funding to develop a time machine to do this?

Did the SPCA use this machine to transport Michael Green back in time to set up M4E because he was overseas when it was actually started on the FLWG?

OK my first question is serious and the second and third more in tune with the crazy allegations made by the ETT blog.

Bear in mind when you read ETT they make allegations which are not supported by facts, I could go through many [perhaps I will] and expose them for what they really are. Other material is just biased reporting looking for the very small percentage of bad and not reporting on the greater percentage of good. Not unlike a shopper at a Veggie stall checking though hundreds of apples looking for just one with a worm and then exclaiming “All your Apples are bad” Readers will not doubt be wary of what very sick minds are involved in that type of process when they cannot see the larger picture.

We are greatly cheered by the fact that ETT [by not responding] has supported our previous claim that many women:
More interesting is that some post on various ’Womens’ support boards BUT when they need real help they go to FLWG.
Let me repeat that: 'When they need real help they go to the FLWG'.

Does this then prove that the SPCA and the FLWG are not anti women and that ETT actually acknowledges this?