ETT goes into panic [paranoia] mode - more self deception from ETT and cronies after we rattled thir cages.

More biased reporting and fiction from ETT –the latest ETT silly stuff is in blue.

Peter what does it feel like to be Used??? We read your blog Peter and quite frankly we haven't had such a belly laugh for quite some time. You do realise that you are being used by Michael Green and friends to attack us as they don't have the gumption to do it themselves. They did the same with Danny Bell and if you want to contact Danny to ask about his AVO regarding threats made to a person that had nothing to do with this blog, we heartily recommend that you do this as a matter of urgency.

Well thank you for laughing – obviously at yourselves! Since have never spoken to Michael Green or ‘his friends’ that remark gives me a chuckle. No Peter is not my name, sorry ETT your source got that one wrong. One and one does not equal three!

You have made a number of incorrect allegations and some pretty outrageous assumptions but then again with your level of intelligence, it is within our expectations of you.

Thank you ETT you are right, with my high IQ/EQ the outrageous assumptions are CORRECT – but the so called allegations are NOT.

We are also reasonably sure that the incorrect and outrageous allegations you have made against specific persons will result in some type of legal action being taken against you.

Not when they can be proved – bring it on PLEASE!
PS What outrageous allegations?

You have alleged blackmail and extortion which is a criminal offence in our country. Allegations of this kind will be dealt with by the police.

Aha you are beginning to learn that greenmail will get you into trouble – and so will naming various women on your blog that have absolutely no connection with the FLWG –causing them to fear for their safety and causing them emotional distress!!
READ THE NSW AVO LEGISLATION VERY CAREFULLY

You have named people and user names in your blog of which we have no knowledge but we will be sure to track them down to alert them of your claims. We are sure that most will not be happy.

ETT do you think that people are fools –do you judge people by your own limited reasoning and abilities. Everyone named is also linked to your blog and the sites you link to – so why would you have to track them down?

You have claimed that what is contained on this blog is untrue but what if we are correct (and we are)? Is it so unpalatable that you must dramatically announce that it is all lies and that it must be the work of various people (and you can't quite make up your mind on that one can you)? We would suggest that you conduct some of your own research as it is all out there on the internet for all to see.

Of course what you write is incorrect and any intelligent person can read it for what it really is – gross misrepresentation, deception and lies by some very sick people.

You have stated that Womens groups are part of S.P.C.A. and FLWG and yet we have proof that the only females represented there have been set up by women (grandmothers and second wives) who have affiliations already with militant Mens Rights groups. It is all a farce and deliberate attempt to defraud not only the public but also the government who funds the Familylawwebguide under false pretences

Then unfortunately you do not read the site properly and the postings from the women that have thanked the FLWG for the help received. None of them are in any groups even remotely related to the SPCA or FLWG. More interesting is that some post on various ’Womens’ support boards BUT when they need real help they go to FLWG.

Let me repeat that: 'When they need real help they go to the FLWG'

You have also claimed that it is dishonest to track traffic to a website. Once again you are only showing your ignorance and embarassing yourself. We have always shown that we know who is coming to the website and it is a common practice and is in no way illegal, dishonest or immoral. You just got caught out so you hide your embarassment with aggression. So typical

You have never informed people you are tracking them, you just make "I am clever" remarks about you think is visiting the site so what you are doing is immoral but unfortunately because your blog contains so many lies and deceptions even a little piece of honestly could not be expected.

It also needs to be pointed out to you that despite you not wanting to provide the address of this blog on either your blog or on familylawwebguide.com.au (an attempt to portray only one side of the argument...what on earth are you afraid of?) that many people have the intelligence to know how to find us anyway. You wouldn't know that though. All one has to do is type in part of a quote and it takes them directly to that page. Your flaccid attempts to censor information have proven fruitless and we would like to thank you once again for all of the extra traffic and hope that readers or contributors of FLWG will be alerted to the truth that hasn't been provided by that website.

Why on Earth should I point people to your blog? It would be like directing people to an open sewer. No - your Google count has not increased as I to get figures from Google and ‘Sitemeter’ it not a good guide to traffic. Oh and remember when you insert HTML code ‘some of us’ may be able to put it in this site or comments made on your blog.
By the way have you figured out which of your people told us you were using Sitemeter?

The SLR was set up by SPCA and so was Mothers4Equality. Debra Esquilante from the Gold Coast set this up in conjunction with Michael Green. Debra Esquilante is an active and key member of Fathers4Equality which is one of the vilest and most anti female mens groups out there. Spot any inconsistencies there Peter?

Yes a big inconsistency! because I assume you mean SRLR which traces back to 1999. You are actually saying the SPCA are really very clever people that can even read the future by setting up an organisation many many years before even the SPCA came into existence! That really beggars belief. Spot another inconsistency in your blog? –according to ETT the SPCA is anti female – if this had any truth in it why on Earth would they set up an organisation that also helps women? Inconsistency yes – if Debra is an active eand key member of F4E why isn’t she posting on their site?

Coral Slattery is also a key member of FLRA and SPCA and yet fights only for grandparents rights, not mother rights. More inconsistencies? Don't try to play the "but we have women involved" card as we know it is a common discussion amongst Mens Rights groups that they need to enlist and enrol as many women as possible in order to gain credibility. Trouble is the only women they allow are second wives who are notorious for "protecting the money" which righfully should go to the children that were fathered first. Once the shoe is on the other foot watch them turn. You would know this.

I see you again confuse Children’s rights with Mens Rights where does it say that the SPCA is a Mens rights organstion. Again you AGAIN put down second partners as second class citizens. Don’t Grandparents come into your lopsided equation – are they second class citizens as well?

The CRC was set up by Lionel Richards one of the founding members of SPCA and now Ed Dabrowski is a Director of that as well as a Director of SPCA. And you are trying to say that they are independent? It appears we know more about the Shared Parenting Council and of familylawwebguide than you do! Please also read our post on the CRC on our blog for more information on the sham group.

You really should do more reading on the CRC so you can present the truth. [Well obviously that is not possible but you could at least try to learn something – other than mindlessly attacking people] Amazing how you know so much about the CRC, SPCA and FLWG and still get one and one to make three. So the gospel according to ETT is “When you don’t have information just invent it – never let the truth stand in the way of a good lie”. Very very silly by assuming any readers you have cannot think for themselves.

Remember that we know who you are and where you are so you cannot rely upon the anonymity of the internet to protect you.

Sounds like a threat of physical violence to me, does this mean I should get an AVO against you?

Well readers that’s what happens when you confront idiots with truth and facts. Mind you I really should not be responding to ETT because according to the old adage “Never argue with an idiot because they will drag you down to their level – and beat you with experience” and ETT has well and truly proven they have the experience.